Apple watch Hermes.
(Image from: apple.com)
During a special Apple event at end of August 2015, Apple have announced that they’ll be co-branding with Hermes to create a new product line – Apple watch Hermes. While this approach to co-branding will surely surprise the audience, it is indeed a meaningful case to look into.
Apple has always been known for its modern and sleek design while boasting its advanced technology.
Hermes, on the other hand, is a brand that’s based on tradition and heritage. Being a conservative brand, it appeals to customers with its timeless designs and leather goods.
Too Diverse – Yay or Nay?
These two brands in question are almost polar opposites of each other – one boasting advanced technology, another playing on tradition and heritage – so why the co-branding?
The answer is rather simple and enlightening in fact.
Being opposites, Apple and Hermes are able to fully leverage on each other’s strong brand name and image, boosting freshness and an element of surprise into both brands.
This partnership with Apple injects freshness and modernity for Hermes and keeps them at the cutting edge of luxury as well as focusing on their strengths – leather goods. As for Apple, the goal for this co-branding is direct – Apple is now a luxurious brand placed beside Hermes and Samsung is not.
Reflection
This article has given me very interesting and crucial insights on co-branding as it challenges the expectations that only similar brands should collaborate. The Apple watch Hermes shows that co-branding works best when two brands with different set of customers and associations partner up. It provides as:
1. an element of surprise to customers
2. An intrigue to customers and therefore raise awareness
3. Reach out to new target audience from partner brand
4. Aids and improve new/existing brand equity
5. Further differentiation from competitors
Another surprising co-branding would be Slim-Fast cake mix and Godiva, both brand positioning clashing with each other. However through the co-branding, it has helped improved both brands positioning and appeal to the larger market audience. EG: Slim-Fast cake mix has appeared to be as tasty as Godiva yet retaining its low-calorie factor and Godiva has appeared to be a more health conscious brand.
This is called the Spill-Over effect where co-branding does not only drive sales, but improve brand equity of both brands.
I’ve learned that by challenging traditional norms, it can bring you surprisingly positive results.
References:
Mark Ritson: Apple’s deal with Hermès is a clear signal that it now considers itself a luxury brand